Saturday, February 23, 2013

MORTGAGE CO. EXECS SUED OVER ROBOSIGNING DEFENSE FEES



Law360, Wilmington (February 13, 2013, 7:53 PM ET) — Lender Processing Services Inc. directors were hit with a shareholder derivative suit Tuesday alleging their failure to go after higher-ups responsible for the “robosigning” of foreclosure documents and other faulty practices left the mortgage servicer on the hook for hefty legal expenses.
Shareholder Steven Hill claims in a complaint filed in Delaware Chancery Court that while Florida-based LPS has borne the high cost of resolving litigation over the business practices of subsidiaries LPS Default Solutions and DocX, including a recently announced $127 million settlement, the company’s…
More @Law360, or read complaint below


SUMMARY JUDGMENT REVERSED


DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
January Term 2013
SERRANO V. HSBC | FL 4TH DCA – SUMMARY JUDGMENT REVERSED: DISPUTE RELATED TO PARAGRAPH 22 CONDITION PRECEDENT TO FORECLOSURE

GIL L. SERRANO, ONELIA SERRANO and TIULANG VALDES,
Appellants,
v.
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR WELLS
FARGO ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION, MORTGAGE ASSETBACKED
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-PA1,
Appellee.
No. 4D11-1767
[February 20, 2013]
PER CURIAM.
Appellants Gil L. Serrano, Onelia Serrano, and Tiulang Valdes, defendants below, appeal a final summary judgment of foreclosure in favor of appellee HSBC Bank USA, N.A. as Trustee for Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Mortgage Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-PA1. We reverse the summary judgment because there remains a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether appelleecomplied with the condition precedent contained in the mortgage to provide pre-suit notice of acceleration. See Dominko v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 102 So. 3d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). We find no merit in the other issues briefed by appellants.
Reversed and remanded.
STEVENSON, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.
pdf here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/126899088/Serrano

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Judge Rejects Wells Fargo's Bid to Have Case Dismissed


Judge Rejects Wells Fargo's Bid to Have Case Dismissed


The federal judge who approved last year’s National Mortgage Settlement between the government and the five largest servicers turned down Wells Fargo’s claim that a federal lawsuit against the bank violates settlement terms.
District Judge Rosemary Collyer wrote in her opinion that Wells Fargo took “a leap of logic” in its interpretation of several settlement provisions that would bar the government from bringing certain claims against the bank.

Friday, January 25, 2013

The IRS & Principal Reduction


IR-2013-8, Jan. 24, 2013
WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today announced guidance to borrowers, mortgage loan holders and loan servicers who are participating in the Principal Reduction AlternativeSM offered through the Department of the Treasury’s and Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Home Affordable Modification Program® (HAMP-PRA®).
To help financially distressed homeowners lower their monthly mortgage payments, Treasury and HUD established HAMP, which is described at www.makinghomeaffordable.gov. Under HAMP-PRA, the principal of the borrower’s mortgage may be reduced by a predetermined amount called the PRA Forbearance Amount if the borrower satisfies certain conditions during a trial period. The principal reduction occurs over three years.
More specifically, if the loan is in good standing on the first, second and third annual anniversaries of the effective date of the trial period, the loan servicer reduces the unpaid principal balance of the loan by one-third of the initial PRA Forbearance Amount on each anniversary date. This means that if the borrower continues to make timely payments on the loan for three years, the entire PRA Forbearance Amount is forgiven. To encourage mortgage loan holders to participate in HAMP–PRA, the HAMP program administrator will make an incentive payment to the loan holder (called a PRA investor incentive payment) for each of the three years in which the loan principal balance is reduced.
Guidance on Tax Consequences to Borrowers
The guidance issued today provides that PRA investor incentive payments made by the HAMP program administrator to mortgage loan holders are treated as payments on the mortgage loans by the United States government on behalf of the borrowers. These payments are generally not taxable to the borrowers under the general welfare doctrine.
If the principal amount of a mortgage loan is reduced by an amount that exceeds the total amount of the PRA investor incentive payments made to the mortgage loan holder, the borrower may be required to include the excess amount in gross income as income from the discharge of indebtedness. However, many borrowers will qualify for an exclusion from gross income.
For example, a borrower may be eligible to exclude the discharge of indebtedness income from gross income if (1) the discharge of indebtedness occurs (in other words, the loan is modified) before Jan. 1, 2014, and the mortgage loan is qualified principal residence indebtedness, or (2) the discharge of indebtedness occurs when the borrower is insolvent. For additional exclusions that may apply, see Publication 4681, Canceled Debts, Foreclosures, Repossessions, and Abandonments (for Individuals).
Borrowers receiving aid under the HAMP–PRA program may report any discharge of indebtedness income — whether included in, or excluded from, gross income — either in the year of the permanent modification of the mortgage loan or ratably over the three years in which the mortgage loan principal is reduced on the servicer’s books. Borrowers who exclude the discharge of indebtedness income must report both the amount of the income and any resulting reduction in basis or tax attributes on Form 982, Reduction of Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Indebtedness (and Section 1082 Basis Adjustment).
Guidance on Tax Consequences to Mortgage Loan Holders
The guidance issued today explains that mortgage loan holders are required to file a Form 1099-C with respect to a borrower who realizes discharge of indebtedness income of $600 or more for the year in which the permanent modification of the mortgage loan occurs. This rule applies regardless of when the borrower chooses to report the income (that is, in the year of the permanent modification or one-third each year as the mortgage loan principal is reduced) and regardless of whether the borrower excludes some or all of the amount from gross income.
Penalty relief is provided for mortgage loan holders that fail to timely file and furnish required Forms 1099-C, as long as certain requirements described in the guidance are satisfied.
Details are in Revenue Procedure 2013-16 available on IRS.gov.
SOURCE: http://www.irs.gov
Wekesa - www.Justiceathome.com

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Glad to be Invited as Author!

Glad to be invited as an author to the Justice@Home Blogger.  Thanks Wekesa for setting this up and inviting me.  I look forward to contributing often.

FIGHTING IS WINNING
Hey Team, Maxine Aarons filed her petition to protect her home in Gwinnette County today and served defendants in Cobb and Fulton.  
Gavel and Constitution - We the People
Fighting is Winning!


She was busy. Three counties in one day! Hey process service is no joke!  


We are so very proud of her.  


Reach out to her and say congratulations.
Email or Call.Go Maxine.


Afiya


Search This Blog

Social Share

Recommend Us On Google
Like Us On Facebook